Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Ark. 276

Wright v. Wooldridge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 21, 1910

Supreme Court of Arkansas · decided 1910-03-21

Elliott, Chancellor; The chancery court was without jurisdiction. Kirby’s Dig., § 59^5 J 71 Ark. 222; Id. 484; 46 Ark. 272. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent of parties where none existed before. 33 Ark. 31; 34 Ark. 399; 70 Ark. 347; 1 Black on Judgments, 217. Since the chancery court would not assume jurisdiction of this cause except upon agreement of parties waiving objections as to jurisdiction, appellant ought not to be heard now to object to the jurisdiction.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1969

2 state decisions

Relies on Whitesides v. Kershaw · Brewer & Son v. Winston · Jackson v. Gorman

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

reversed · Decided 1910-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Battle, J.

¶1This action was brought by J. H. Wright against E. and. H. Wooldridge, on. the ■ 14th day of December, 1906, before a justice of the peace of Cleveland County, to recover $200, loaned by plaintiff to the defendants, and interest. The plaintiff recovered judgment, and the defendants appealed to the Cleveland Circuit Court. On appeal the action was transferred byk consent to the Cleveland Chancery Court, and on hearing that court .dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for want of equity, and plaintiff appealed to this court.

¶2In Whitesides v. Kershaw, 44 Ark. 377, 379, it is said: “On appeal from a justice of the peace court, the jurisdiction of the circuit court is derived from and is dependent upon the appeal. It cannot put its original jurisdiction into exercise by -superadding to the pending controversy a cause of action or an issue that the justice of the peace could not entertain. In such case the circuit court can render no judgment that the. justice of the peace is not authorized to render.” To the same effect, see Brewer v. Winston, 46 Ark. 163; Jackson v. Gorman, 70 Ark. 88; Barrett v. Nichols, 85 Ark. 58.

¶3Neither could a chancery court, in such cases, acquire, by a transfer from the circuit court, jurisdiction which the justice of the peace did not have. Justices of the peace cannot enforce equitable remedies, and no such jurisdiction can -be acquired by any court by appeal from that court.

¶4The judgment of the chancery court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to that court to remand it to the Cleveland Circuit - Court.

/94/ark/276 · .json · Public domain