Randleman v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1910
Citation profile
38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently January 1998 · most notably Gregory v. Jones (1947), Harris v. Robertson (1991)
38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eaton v. Langley · Schraeder Min Manuf'G Co v. Packer · Nashville Lumber Co. v. Barefield · Hays v. Dickey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * It is only where the true line is unknown or is difficult of ascertainment, and the parties establish the line to settle a disputed and vexatious question as to the boundary line between them, that the agreement is binding.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Trx v. Mefford
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.