94 Ark. App. 45 - BEQIRI v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2014
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · Wright v. State · 93 Ark. App. 91 - Tumlison v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“should pay restitution for her crime”); Beqiri v. State, 94 Ark. App. 45 , 224 S.W.3d 575, 576 (2006) (”[W]e have held that the remedy for irregularities in the calculation of restitution lies in remand for a new hearing.”); Gray v. State, 273 Ga.App. 747 , 615 S.E.2d 834, 837 (2005) (stating that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burt, Lemuel Carl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.