Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 BR 120 - In Re Pendlebury

In Re Pendlebury’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably In Re Briggs (1992), 40 1105 77782 Turner

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 722 · 11 U.S.C. § 727 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Bell General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Bell · In Re Whatley · Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Sholos (In Re Sholos) · Schmidt v. American Fletcher National Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Schmidt) · In Re Whitaker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) in a case concerning an individual who was not represented by an attorney during the course of negotiating an agreement under this subsection, the court approves such agreement as— (i) not imposing an undue hardship on the debtor or a dependent of the debtor; and (ii) in the best interest of the debtor. (B) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to the extent that such debt is a consumer debt secured by real property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “In practice, reaffirmation hearings presently serve no useful purpose except for debtors filing pro se.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.