94 Cal. App. 441 - Nylund v. Madsen’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently June 1963 · most notably 88 Cal. App. 2d 708 - Lazzarevich v. Lazzarevich (1948), Estate of Reinhertz (1947)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Head v. Hargrave · Cowdery v. McChesney · 52 Cal. App. 405 - Baker v. Keller · 78 Cal. App. 127 - Young v. Bruere · Crusoe v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘In an action for services rendered the questions whether they were rendered, and if so, what is their value, are for the jury; and in the absence of evidence of the value of such services, or where the evidence leaves uncertain the amount plaintiff is entitled to recover, the jury may estimate their value from their own judgment and knowledge on the subject,’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.