Rhode v. Bartholomew’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently March 1997 · most notably Meyer v. State Board of Equalization (1954), 9 Cal. 3d 1 - Tyrone v. Kelley (1973)
4 federal appellate · 59 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mattingly v. Pennie · Massie v. Dudley · Shaffer v. Beinhorn · 16 Cal. 2d 70 - Bloss v. Rahilly · Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Unquestionably, respondent offered the stock for sale. He attempted to dispose of it. He attempted to sell it. He solicited a sale of the stock by appellants. These acts were sufficient to bring him within the terms of the act. We think also that he negotiated for the sale of the stock. He treated with others with a view to sale of the stock, which is negotiating.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Freeman v. Jergins“every disposition, or attempt to dispose, of a security or interest in a security for value.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Freeman v. Jergins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.