94 Cal. App. 4th 1024 - People v. Merced’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
October 2005
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on 22 Cal. 4th 690 - People v. Waidla · 1 Cal. 4th 495 - People v. Kelly · People v. Holt · 28 Cal. 3d 1 - Hovey v. Superior Court · 53 Cal. 3d 152 - People v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that [they] feel that [they] should mention at this time that might affect [their] ability to be fair and impartial juror[s] in this case. " (emphasis added). Prospective alternate juror Andrew B. answered as follows: "I recognize and believe in jury nullification where appropriate.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Merced v. McGrath“a prospective juror may be excused if the juror's voir dire responses convey a `definite impression' that the juror's views `would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Merced v. McGrath“that [they] feel that [they] should mention at this time that might affect [their] ability to be fair and impartial juror[s] in this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Merced v. McGrath
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.