Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Conn. 475 - Murphy v. Linskey

Murphy v. Linskey’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
4
states following
October 1962
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently October 1962 · most notably Goldman v. Feinberg (1944), Pitt v. Kent (1962)

28 state decisions

9019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Whitcomb v. Bacon · Hoadley v. Savings Bank · Loomis v. Perkins · Rosenfield v. Wall · Seward v. M. Seward & Son Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where two or more brokers without exclusive authority to sell, play some part in a transaction of sale, each contributing something to bring about the resulting sale, each is not entitled to a commission or to share in the commission paid. Some one of them is entitled to it, and he the one who deserves to be regarded as the procuring cause of the sale by reason of his efforts having been an efficient proximate cause in its accomplishment, or, as otherwise expressed, the `predominating efficient cause' of such accomplishment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The finding of a prospective purchaser is not the only service of the broker. A large part of his effort, perhaps the greater part, is in inducing either the purchaser to meet the seller's terms or price, or the seller to make concessions in the terms to meet the purchaser's wishes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.