Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.1d 321 - Garner v. Trumbull

Garner v. Trumbull’s Empirical Analysis

94 F. 321 · 1899

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
November 1933
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1933

9 federal appellate ·

6018991900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barry v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co. · Frick v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co. · Taylor v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. · Roth v. Union Depot Co. · Gulf, C. & S. F. R. Co. v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘‘Knowing the usage which prevails, they may reasonably be required to anticipate the probable presence oí persons on or miar the track at such places, and to be on the lookout when tlieir attention is not directed to the performance of their other duties.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.