Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.1d 582 - Cooper v. Hill

Cooper v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

94 F. 582 · 1899

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
2
states following
September 2003
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently September 2003 · most notably Bovay v. H. M. Byllesby & Co. (1944), Herrmann v. Edwards (1915)

24 federal appellate · 10 district · 4 state decisions

160189919001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Briggs v. Spaulding · California Bank v. Kennedy · United States v. State of North Carolina · Logan County Nat Bank v. Townsend · Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Tins is a suit to compel the restoration of a trust fund of $20,864.S2 which the appellants unlawfully diverted from that fund, and it involves an accounting of the money diverted between the receiver and the appellants. It is therefore a suit against officers of a bank to execute a trust and to compel an accounting, and it avoids a multiplicity of suits at law. This court has repeatedly held, for reasons which now seem to us obvious, and which are stated at length in our opinions, that equity has jurisdiction of such a suit. Hayden v. Thompson, 36 U. S. App. 362, 307, 17 C. C. A. 592 , 594. and 71 Fed. 60 , 62; Cockrill v. Cooper, 57 U. S. App. 576, 29 C. C. A. 529 , 535, 538, and 86 Fed. 7 , 12, 16.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.