Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 F.2d 1015

Docket No. 8697.

Keller v. Hall

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1938.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1938-03-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1947

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1938-03-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1'Knapp, Boyle & Thompson, of Tucson, Ariz., and David R. Faries, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Leslie C. Hardy, of Phoenix, Ariz., and Otto E. Myrland and Ben Shantz, both of Tucson, Ariz., for appellee.

¶3Before DENMAN, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Upon stipulation of respective parties, and their counsel, ordered decree of the District Court herein reversed, and that this cause be remanded to the said District Court for a new trial, that each party bear his own costs on appeal, that a decree be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate of this court herein issue forthwith.

/94/f2d/1015 · .json · Public domain