Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 F.2d 1018

Docket No. 7949.

Mutch v. Seignious

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Feb. 16, 1938.

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1938-02-16

2 counsel of record

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1938-02-16

¶1Weadock & Weadock, of Saginaw, Mich., and Clausen, Hirsh & Miller, of Chicago, 111., for appellants.

¶2Clark & Henry, of Bay City, Mich., for appellees.

¶3Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5It appearing to the court that a motion to docket and dismiss appeal has been filed, accompanied by certificate of the clerk of the District Court as provided by rule 18, and it further appearing that appellants have failed to file the record or docket the case by or before the return day, and that there has been no extension of time therefor, on consideration whereof, it is ordered that the appeal be, and the same is, docketed and dismissed.

¶6Appeal docketed and dismissed.

/94/f2d/1018 · .json · Public domain