Babe v. Pinko’s Empirical Analysis
94 F.2d 259 · 1938
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 1972
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Evidently, the statute requiring such books of account could have no application to the period when he was employed at a salary of $15 per week.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Lepley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.