Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.2d 736 - First Nat. Bank v. Conway Road Estates Co.

First Nat. Bank v. Conway Road Estates Co.’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.2d 736 · 1938

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
December 1983
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently December 1983 · most notably In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc. (1981), Furness v. Lilienfield (1983)

20 federal appellate · 3 district ·

90193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank · Harrison v. Chamberlin · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox · Harkin v. Brundage · Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a reorganization proceeding under section 77B [ 11 U.S.C.A. § 207 ] good faith means more than honesty of purpose. It also requires that there be a reasonable possibility of successful reorganization. Wright v. Vinton Branch Bank, 300 U.S. 440 , 463, 57 S.Ct. 556 , 562, 81 L.Ed. 736 [ 112 A.L.R. 1455 ]; Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American Bank, supra [ 299 U.S. 18 , 57 S.Ct. 85 , 81 L.Ed. 13 ]; In re Tennessee Publishing Co., 6 Cir., 81 F.2d 463 ; In re Loeb Apartments, 7 Cir., 89 F.2d 461 ; Manati Sugar Co. v. Mock, 2 Cir., 75 F.2d 284 ; O’Connor v. Mills, 8 Cir., 90 F.2d 665 ; Provident Ins. Co. v. University Church, 9 Cir., 90 F.2d 992 . “Whenever want of good faith appears the debtor’s petition should be dismissed even though a plan of reorganization has not been submitted. The District Court was reversed for failure to dismiss in such a case in Provident Ins. Co. v. University Church, supra, in Re Wisun & Golub, 2 Cir., 84 F.2d 1 , and in Re North Kenmore Corporation, 7 Cir., 81 F.2d 656 . The-judgment of the District Court dismissing the petition for want of good faith was affirmed in O’Connor v. Mills, supra; in Manati Sugar Co. v. Mock, supra; and in Re Grigsby-Grunow Co., 7 Cir., 77 F.2d 200 . “In Brockett v. Winkle Terra Cotta Co., 8 Cir., 81 F.2d 949 , 953, Judge Van Vallcenburgh, speaking for this court, said in-reference to section 77B: ‘ “The outstanding purpose of the Amended Act, upon which this case rests, was to afford aid in the effort to rehabilitate ”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.