Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 1005 - Trest v. Whitley

Trest v. Whitley’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 1005 · 1996

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1999
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Coleman v. Thompson · Custis v. United States · Gray v. Netherland · Sones v. Hargett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When considering requests for federal habeas corpus relief, this Court has frequently explained that we review the district court's factual findings for clear error, but review issues of law de novo.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.