Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 1062 - Evans v. McBride

Evans v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 1062 · 1996

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2012 · most notably Piggie v. Cotton (2003), Sweeney v. Parke (1997)

20 federal appellate ·

250199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Wolff v. McDonnell · Heck v. Humphrey · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Our circuit has issued a number of opinions requiring prison disciplinary officials to explain their actions more fully, . . . but if these are extensions of (rather than glosses on) the decisions of the Supreme Court, they provide a poor foundation for relief under the amended sec.2254.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]f [our circuit's opinions] are extensions of (rather than glosses on) the decisions of the Supreme Court, they provide a poor foundation for relief under the amended sec. 2254.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.