Reese v. Delo’s Empirical Analysis
94 F.3d 1177 · 1996
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Lambert v. Blodgett (2004), Sweet v. Delo (1997)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Coleman v. Thompson · Teague v. Lane · Murray v. Carrier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must show . . . that, but for his attorney's error, the result on appeal would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In determining whether a confession is voluntary, we consider the totality of the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“counsel has discretion to abandon losing issues on appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.