Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 1321 - Baylor v. Estelle

Baylor v. Estelle’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 1321 · 1996

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably O'Brien v. Dubois (1998), Moore v. Calderon (1997)

20 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

210199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. Ratelle · Sims v. Livesay · Evans v. Lewis · Thomas v. Goldsmith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.