Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 1413 - Burlington Northern Railroad v. Huddleston

Burlington Northern Railroad v. Huddleston’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 1413 · 1996

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
2
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2020 · most notably Dill v. City of Edmond (1998), ANR Pipeline Co. v. Lafaver (1998)

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 2 state decisions

1401996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis · Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc. · Kunkel v. Continental Casualty Co. · Western Air Lines, Inc. v. Board of Equalization of SD · Dikeman v. National Educators, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If no question exists as to the finality of the district court's decision, the absence of a Rule 58 judgment will not prohibit appellate review.); see also Bankers Trust, 435 U.S. at 385 (”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “from the tax all but a certain class of taxpayers, which, as the Court noted in ACF , is really not an”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “questions of law turning on the interpretation and application of a federal statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.