Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 189 - Oppenheimer v. Prudential Securities Inc.

Oppenheimer v. Prudential Securities Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 189 · 1996

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Ramming v. United States (2001), Columbia Propane, L.P. v. Wisconsin Gas Co. (2003)

4 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

240199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Commissioner v. Engle · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. · United States v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all averments of fraud or mistake, the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake shall be stated with particularity. Malice, intent, knowledge, and other condition of mind of a person may be averred generally.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the plaintiff's complaint is to be construed in a light most favorable to plaintiff, and the allegations contained therein are to be . . . taken as true.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The elements that are necessary to state a claim of common law fraud are basically identical [to those for statutory fraud]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.