Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 217 - Byrd v. Pw Stone

Byrd v. Pw Stone’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Catz v. Chalker (1998), Olsen v. Mapes (2003)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

3301996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · Landscape Properties, Inc. v. Vogel · Welch v. Folsom · Puett v. Blandford · Sellers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(m) Time Limit for Service. If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate period.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “At the request of the plaintiff ... the court may direct that service be effected by a United States marshal, or other person or officer specially appointed by the court for that purpose. Such an appointment must be made when the plaintiff is authorized to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 ....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““If a service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the complaint and the party on whose behalf such service was required cannot show good cause why such service was not made within that period, the action shall be dismissed as to that defendant without prejudice upon the court’s own initiative with notice to such party or upon motion.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.