Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 410 - Eback v. Chater

Eback v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 410 · 1996

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2018

7 federal appellate · 3 district ·

100199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCoy v. Schweiker · McMillian v. Schweiker · Thomas v. Sullivan · Hogg v. Shalala · Harris v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The inquiry into other available jobs] is based on the functional demands and duties of jobs as ordinarily required by employers throughout the national economy, and not on what may be isolated variations in job demands (regardless of whether such variations are due to compliance with anti-discrimination statutes or other factors). Whether or how an employer might be willing (or required) to alter job duties to suit the limitations of a specific individual would not be relevant because our assessment must be based on broad vocational patterns ... rather than on any individual employer's practices. To support a ... finding that an individual can perform "other work," the evidence ... would have to show that a job, which is within the individual's capacity because of employer modifications, is representative of a significant number of other such jobs in the national economy.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the ADA and the disability provisions of the Social Security Act have different purposes and have no direct relationship to each other”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “would be a reasonable accommodation that an employer could or should make, particularly considering the ADA.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.