Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 F.3d 642

Docket No. 96-6688.

Peay v. Guiton

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted June 28, 1996. Decided Aug. 14, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-08-14

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Arlene W. Newcomb v. Food Lion, Incorporated

Decided 1996-08-14

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Benjamin Shabazz Peay, Appellant Pro Se.

Susan Moore Lewis, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Peay v. Guiton, No. CA-94-520-2 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995; Mar. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/94/f3d/642 · .json · Public domain