Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 F.3d 652

Docket No. 95-16823.

Osborn v. Hatcher

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.* Decided Aug. 16, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-08-16

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 2006

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Rogers v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM…

¶2

Clifford Osborn, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his third petition for writ of habeas corpus. Osborn, who pleaded guilty in 1983 to kidnapping, robbery, grand larceny and possession of a firearm, alleges a host of sentencing errors. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation. No further filings will be accepted in this closed docket.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

/94/f3d/652 · .json · Public domain