Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 F.3d 652

Docket No. 96-15082.

Robles v. Crofoot

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Aug. 12, 1996.* Decided Aug. 22, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-08-22

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Rogers v. United States

Decided 1996-08-22

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Before: BROWNING, SCHROEDER and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM…

¶2

Joe Allen Robles, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order filed December 8, 1995.

AFFIRMED.1

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

1

Because of our disposition of this appeal, we do not consider the applicability, if any, of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), to this appeal

/94/f3d/652 · .json · Public domain