Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 F.3d 89 - United States v. Mortimer

United States v. Mortimer’s Empirical Analysis

94 F.3d 89 · 1996

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
April 2010
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2010

8 federal appellate · 3 district ·

120199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Trident Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. · United States v. Miller · United States v. Porter · United States v. Kassar · United States v. Mortimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because payment schedules under the IFRP are not fixed according to a predetermined formula, but rather vary at the discretion of the prison staff, the delegation is just as real as in Porter,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a district court may not delegate its authority to set the amount and timing of fine payments to the Bureau of Prisons or the probation officer”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.