Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Fla. 295

114 So 319

Barse v. Whaley

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 19, 1927

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1927-07-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1931

1 state decisions

Relies on Farrell v. Forest Investment Co. · Travis v. Travis · Simpson v. First National Bank of Pensacola

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-07-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed upon authority of Farrell v. Forest Inv. Co., 73 Fla. 191, 74 South. Rep. 216; Davidson v. Collier, 75 Fla. 783, 78 South, Rep. 983; Smith v. O’Brien, 75 Fla. 252, 78 South. Rep. 13; Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 South. Rep. 762.; Simpson v. First Nat. Bank of Pensacola, 74 Fla. 539, 77 South. Rep. 204; Burgess v. Wirt, 91 Fla. 425, 108 South. Rep. 169.

¶2 Affirmed

Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur.
/94/fla/295 · .json · Public domain