In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 18 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Relies on Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co. · Brunette MacHine Works, Ltd. v. Kockum Industries, Inc. · Green v. Advance Ross Electronics Corp. · GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp. · Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If the exercise of jurisdiction is consistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, serving a summons or filing a waiver of service is also effective, with respect to claims arising under federal law, to establish personal jurisdiction over the person of any defendant who is not subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of general jurisdiction of any state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.