State v. Rauch’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 district · 61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably In the Interest of Doe (2001), State v. Valdivia (2001)
1 district · 61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fertel-Rust v. Dane County Social Services · Magill v. Evans · State v. Arceo · State v. Toyomura · Gray v. Administrative Director of Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he reason and spirit of the law, and the cause which induced the legislature to enact it ... to discover its true meaning.”
31 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`[g]enerally, to constitute an abuse it must appear that the court clearly exceeded the bounds of reason or disregarded rules or principles of law or practice to the substantial detriment of a party litigant.'”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Mundon · State v. PECPEC“We answer questions of constitutional law `by exercising our own independent judgment based on the facts of the case,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.