Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 ILL 349 - Hayward v. Merrill

Hayward v. Merrill’s Empirical Analysis

1880

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
10
states following
February 1971
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently February 1971 · most notably Bowman v. Redding & Co. (1971), Kress v. Markline (1917)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 10 states

601880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The opening ought to have been better protected than it was, and the ■omission to do so, under the circumstances proven, may well be attributed to the defendant as gross negligence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.