Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

94 Ill. App. 405

Casey v. Jordan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 8, 1901

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1901-04-08

<p>1. Practice—Placing Causes on the Short Cause Calendar.—It is error to place a case on the short cause calendar upon the filing of a mere copy of an affidavit. The statute requires the filing of an affidavit, not a copy.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1905

1 state decisions

Relies on Donnerstag v. Loewenthal · Parsley v. Halloran

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed and remanded · Decided 1901-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Sears

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2Appellee brought this suit against appellant before a justice of the peace to recover an amount claimed to be due as rent of premises occupied by appellant. From a judgment of the justice of the peace in favor of appellee, appellant appealed to the Circuit Court.

¶3In the Circuit Court the cause was placed upon the short cause- calendar upon motion of appellee. Mo affidavit was filed in the Circuit Court, as required by the statu té, a prerequisite to the placing of a cause upon the short cause calendar. (Sec. 95, Chap. 110, R. S.) The record shows that a copy only, of such affidavit was filed in the court. If the original affidavit is still in existence, its whereabouts are undisclosed and it was never filed in the Circuit Court. Therefore the cause was improperly placed upon the short cause calendar. Donnerstag v. Loewenthal, 77 Ill. App. 159; Parsley v. Holloran, 87 Ill. App. 581.

¶4Counsel for appellant entered his motion in apt time to strike the cause from the short cause calendar, and renewed the motion at the beginning of the. trial. The motion was denied. This was error.

¶5The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

/94/illapp/405 · .json · Public domain