Hudelson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1884
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Anderson v. State (1885), People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . Lavin (1904)
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Powers v. State · Clem v. State · Hull v. . Ruggles · State v. Clarke · Dunn v. People
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Paraphrased, the instruction is a charge to the jury that, if the facts stated in the indictment were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, they must convict the defendants, and that they had no right to determine the question as to whether those facts constituted a public offence. This, we think, is not the law; the instruction is, therefore, erroneous."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Pritchard v. State““ In all criminal cases whatever, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.