Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 KAN 18 - Marney v. Joseph

Marney v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2008

9 state decisions

401915192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Coleman v. MacLennan · Richardson v. Gunby · Redgate v. Roush · Kirkpatrick v. Eagle Lodge No. 32

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is first contended that the defamatory statements in question belong in the class called absolute privilege. This. privilege is founded on public policy and provides immunity for those engaged in the public service and in the enactment and administration of law. It is not intended so much for the protection of those engaged in that service as it is for the promotion of the public welfare, the purpose being that members of the legislature, judges of courts, jurors, lawyers and witnesses may speak their minds freely and exercise their respective functions without incurring the risk of a criminal prosecution or an action for recovery of damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.