Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 KAN 48 - Kirby v. Broaddus

Kirby v. Broaddus’s Empirical Analysis

1915

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
January 1941
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1941

10 state decisions

601915192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steib v. Whitehead · Bunting v. Speek · Durand v. Higgins · Brady v. Fuller · Peck v. Ayres

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““His essential purpose is as the rule interprets it — to vest the fee in the grantee, but to disable him from alienating it. This he can not do, and the attempted restriction is ineffective.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.