Emerson-Brantingham Co. v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis
1915
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1935
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Behan · Sparks v. Reliable Dayton Motor Car Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The measure of damages for breach of a contract giving the plaintiff the exclusive, agency for the sale of automobiles where the manufacturer invades the plaintiff’s territory is the amount of commissions or discounts of which the plaintiff is deprived by sales made by the defendant.” (Syl. IF 1.') '”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““It is' mutually agreed that this contract' may be terminated at any time either by the Company or distributors, giving thirty days’ notice in writing to the other of their intention so to do.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.