Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Md. App. 152 - Farrell v. Phillips

94 Md. App. 152 - Farrell v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on General Motors Corp. v. Lahocki · Wentz v. State · Goen v. Sansbury · Mayor of Baltimore v. Chesapeake Marine Railway Co. · Tamburo v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The reason is that the dedication is not complete and the original dedicator or his successors in interest may revoke or modify the offer to dedicate, in whole or in part, until there is an acceptance. Adverse possession of property offered but not accepted for public use forecloses the right, title and interest of the original dedicator with respect to the property offered to the public and revokes the offer to dedicate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.