94 Md. App. 649 - Graves v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably 127 Md. App. 678 - Bates & Beharry v. State (1999), Tapscott v. State (1995)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Neil v. Biggers · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Wood v. Georgia · Dorsey v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder this approach a trial court is required to conduct an evidentiary hearing to: 1. determine whether attorneys employed by the same public defender’s office can be considered the same as private attorneys associated in the same law firm; 2. weigh factors relating to the protection of confidential information by considering whether there are separate offices, facilities and personnel; and 3. determine whether, as a consequence of having access to confidential information, [a deputy] public defender refrained from effectively representing a defendant.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“around the Kailua area.” Tr. 7/17/92 at 19-20, 29. 3 . Hawai'i Rules of Penal Procedure Rule 33 requires that a motion for new trial "be made within 10 days after verdict or finding of guilty or within such time as the court may fix during the 10-day period.” In this case, the trial court rendered its guilty verdict on July 17, 1992. Defendant's written motion for new trial, while filed timely, alleged only the falsity of Officer Dansu-ka’s testimony, as grounds for a new trial. It was only at the hearing on the motion on August 14, 1992 that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim was raised. Accordingly, the State argues that this court has no jurisdiction to hear the claim. 4 . The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides in relevant part that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” A similar right is guaranteed to criminal defendants by virtue of article I, section 14 of the Hawai'i Constitution, which provides partly that "[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the assistance of counsel for the accused’s defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pitt““These are his personal notes. It’s not quite in the normal course of business. This doesn’t reflected [sic]— necessarily for police officers on duty to keep this particular type of report and notebook. These are his personal notes. It’s just a name there, no other identification. This is just a name he jots down. “I don’t think this is kept during the course of business. This a personal book. The — have an opportunity to ask ' questions about this book. I just don’t think that’s considered a business record for the purposes of having it admitted at this point into evidence.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Graves v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.