Johnson v. Morton’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1933
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Forbes v. Hyde · Turney v. Yeoman · Staples v. . Fairchild · Stewart v. Hawley · Taylor v. Moffatt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The determination of the judge must-be held to have all the qualities of a judicial decision, and as such protects the judge, the officer, and the party.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is evident that this affidavit lacks in detaü and in certainty, and for that reason it is insufficient; but it cannot be said that it sets forth no facts or circumstances indicating fraud or breach of trust,”—”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thomas v. Rosecrantz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.