Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 MICH 268 - Luebe v. Thorpe

Luebe v. Thorpe’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 1907
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Grand Rapids Booming Co. v. Jarvis · Atlas Mining Co. v. Johnston · People v. Rawn · People v. Baumann · Newcomb v. Andrews

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It does not follow, however, that the act of the circuit judge in excusing the juror was prejudicial to the defendant. It does not appear that there were not remaining a sufficient number of jurors of the regular panel to form a jury to try this case; nor does it appear that the defendant had any ground of objection to any of those who actually sat in the case, or that she had exhaused her peremptory challenges.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.