Stebbins v. Stebbins’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 1984
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Prentis v. Bates · Gott v. Culp · Buckley v. Gerard · Ramsdill v. Wentworth · Seeley v. Howard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When any testator shall omit to provide in his will for airf of his children, or for 'the issue of any deceased child, and it shall appear that such omission was not intentional, but was made by mistake or accident, such child, or the issue of such child, shall have the same share in the estate of the testator as if he had died intestate. ’ ’”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brown v. Brown · Carpenter v. Snow
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.