Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 MICH 374 - Gillespie v. Beecher

Gillespie v. Beecher’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 1932
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 1932

5 state decisions

3018921900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The married woman’s act was passed for the protection of married women. It was intended as a shield, and not as a sword. Its purpose was to enlarge her rights, not to contract them; and certainly it was not meant to deprive her of the right, either acting alone or jointly with others, of protecting her interests in property, either real or personal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.