Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 Nev. 128 - Cunningham v. State

Cunningham v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Bolden v. State (1981), Jackson v. State (2001)

1 district · 56 state decisions

220197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. Florida · Thompson v. Hubbard · Spillers v. State · Oliver v. State · Hankins v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall conduct the initial examination of prospective jurors, and defendant or his attorney and the district attorney are entitled to supplement the examination by further inquiry as the court deems proper. Any supplemental examination must not be unreasonably restricted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.