Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 N.M. 118 - State v. Diamond

State v. Diamond’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently July 2011

2 district · 22 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re Oliver · Johnson v. Mississippi · Chula v. Superior Court · Matter of Klecan · Matter of Avallone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Except for a narrowly limited category of contempts, due process of law ... requires that one charged with contempt of court be advised of the charges against him, have a reasonable opportunity to meet them by way of defense or explanation, have the right to be represented by counsel, and have a chance to testify and call other witnesses in his behalf, [our emphasis] either by way of defense or explanation. The narrow exception to these due process requirements includes only charges of misconduct, in open court, in the presence of the judge, which disturbs the court’s business, where all of the essential elements of the misconduct are under the eye of the court, are actually observed by the court, and where immediate punishment is essential to prevent ‘demoralization of the court's authority’ before the public.” (Emphasis in original.)”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “contempt, consisting of misconduct or some disobedient, scurrilous, or other defiant act engaged in out of the court's presence. The court in Diamond held that the failure of an attorney to appear for a scheduled hearing constitutes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “contempt, consisting of contumacious words spoken or acts committed in the presence of the court, and (2)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.