Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 N.M. 325 - Perea v. Gorby

Perea v. Gorby’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 2007

15 state decisions

110198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Marez v. Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corp. · Aranda v. Mississippi Chemical Corp. · Yates v. Matthews · Hanks v. Walker · Renfro v. San Juan Hospital, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all cases where the defendants deny that an alleged disability is a natural and direct result of the accident, the workman must establish that causal connection as a medical probability by expert medical testimony. No award of compensation shall be based on speculation or on expert testimony that as a medical possibility the causal connection exists. [Emphasis added.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he voluntary payment of * * * benefits over a period of time * * * is not an admission by the employer of the totality of permanency of any injury. The employer may at any time discontinue payments and the onus would then be on the employee to establish the permanency and totality of his injury. (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Voluntary payments [of workmen’s compensation benefits] are, however, an admission equivalent to an award of compensation benefits under § 52-l-28(A), and paid by defendants to plaintiff. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.