Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 N.M. 59 - Pedrazza v. Sid Fleming Contractor, Inc.

Pedrazza v. Sid Fleming Contractor, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
10
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Bottijliso v. Hutchison Fruit Co. (1981), State v. Lucero (1982)

50 state decisions — followed in 10 states

2901980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Cannon v. United States · Johnson v. Eisentrager · Pembina Consolidated Silver Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No claim or judgment for compensation, under this act ..., shall accrue to or be recovered by relatives or dependents not residents of the United States at the time of the injury of such workman”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is important to note the exclusive nature and operation of workmen’s compensation. If an employer and employee are covered by the Act, all their rights and remedies are defined exclusively by the Act. § 52-1-9, N.M.S.A.1978. As between the employer and the employee, all other common law and statutory actions are barred by the Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “This opinion does not deny plaintiffs other avenues of recovery. The worker and his dependents are independent of and take separately from one another under the Act. Therefore, the bar against using other legal remedies to recover for the injury or death of a worker cannot be raised against those dependents not covered by the Act.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.