Shultz v. Pascoe’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2007
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Webb v. Beal · Wittich v. O'Neal · Tatavich v. Pettine · Woods v. Fambrough · Unity Light & Power Co. v. City of Burley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It seems just and right that where a party asks the interposition of the power of the courts ... to deprive the defendant of some right or privilege claimed by him [or her], ... if on investigation it is found that the plaintiff had no just right either in the law or the facts to justify him [or her] in asking and obtaining from the court such a harsh and drastic exercise of its authority, that he [or she] should indemnify the defendant in the language of his [or her] bond for ‘all damages he [or she] might sustain,’ and that reasonable counsel fees necessary to the recovering of such injunction are properly part of his [or her] damage.” .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“where a resolution of the principal or underlying issues is in favor of the party enjoined and the injunction is found to be wrongful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'plaintiff had no just right either in the law or the facts to justify him in asking and obtaining'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.