Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 N.M. 767 - State v. Urioste

State v. Urioste’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2012

10 state decisions

401980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Alford v. United States · Frazier v. Cupp · Illinois v. Vitale · State v. Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to prove that this man was part of the conspiracy, admitted that he was, in fact, a member of that conspiracy, and that he did, in fact, conspire with [the defendant].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause it deprived [the defendant] of the right to confront witnesses against her.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.