Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 94 N.M. 802 - Lung v. O'CHESKY

Lung v. O'CHESKY’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2011

16 state decisions

801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden · Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co. · Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont. · Shaffer v. Carter · Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. J.C. Penney Co., [311 U.S.] at 446, 61 S.Ct. at 250 , quoting Compania de Tobacos v. Collector, 275 U.S. 87, 100 , 48 S.Ct. 100, 105 , 72 L.Ed. 177 (1927) (Holmes, J., dissenting). The opportunity to exercise”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.