94 Ohio App. 3d 123 - Ross v. Ross’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably 100 Ohio App. 3d 473 - Blumenthal v. Medina Supply Co. (1995), 97 Ohio App. 3d 779 - Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Williams (1994)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Polikoff v. Adam · Balson v. Dodds · 31 Ohio St. 3d 256 - Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. Rubin · Amato v. General Motors Corp. · 5 Ohio App. 3d 13 - State v. Mabry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a determination of what constitutes a special proceeding *Page 7 requires an examination of the nature of the relief sought. Thus, to qualify as a special proceeding under Polikoff , supra, the remedy sought by the aggrieved party (1) must be that which is conferred by an Ohio statute, or (2) it must be a proceeding that represents what is essentially an independent judicial inquiry. {¶ 12} Applying the above analysis to the instant case, we find that "disqualification of counsel necessitates an independent judicial inquiry on issues of fact and law that does not arise from the pleading. It is controlled by an independent review mechanism (the Disciplinary Rules) unconnected to the facts and issues in the pleading. It is, therefore, reviewable immediately, as a final appealable order, pursuant to R.C. 2505.02 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a determination of what constitutes a special proceeding *Page 7 requires an examination of the nature of the relief sought. Thus, to qualify as a special proceeding under Polikoff , supra, the remedy sought by the aggrieved party (1) must be that which is conferred by an Ohio statute, or (2) it must be a proceeding that represents what is essentially an independent judicial inquiry. {¶ 12} Applying the above analysis to the instant case, we find that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“it is a reversible error for the trial court to summarily disqualify an attorney solely on a paper allegation without a hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.