94 Ohio App. 3d 228 - Bryan v. Looker’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 104 Ohio App. 3d 250 - Weiper v. W.A. Hill & Associates (1995), 150 Ohio App. 3d 367 - McCarthy v. Lippitt (2002)
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 86 Ohio App. 3d 364 - Ford v. Tandy Transportation, Inc. · 137 Ohio St. 153 - Russell v. Russell · 98 Ohio App. 509 - Huls v. Huls · 62 Ohio App. 2d 137 - Spector v. Giunta · 88 Ohio App. 7 - Shively v. Shively
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the right to partition is controlled by statute, it has long been held to be essentially equitable in nature.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'A contract which is not likely to be fully completed within a year, and which in fact is not completed within a year, does not automatically violate the Statute of Frauds if, at the time the contract is made, there is a possibility in law and in fact that full performance such as the parties intended may be completed before the expiration of a year.' Bryan v. Looker (1994), 94 Ohio App.3d 228 , 234, 640 N.E.2d 590 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Krlich v. Clemente“[t]enants in common, survivorship tenants, and coparceners, of any estate in lands, tenements, or hereditaments within the state, may be compelled to make or suffer partition thereof * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.